Wednesday, August 1, 2012

Milos Forman film series showing at NGA in September

     
 
 
     One of my favorite all time directors, Milos Forman's career has spanned 50 years and is still going strong.  He is one of only 3 living directors with 2 Oscars for best picture (with Coppola and Eastwood), and he has directed 8 different actors in best actor Oscar performances.  He has directed some of my favorite films of the last 30 years, The People vs Larry Flynt, Amadeus, Valmont, One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, Man on the Moon, Ragtime, Hair...

     The National Gallery of Art is showing free screenings of some of his earliest films and also the Director's cut of Amadeus throughout the month of September.
 
 
Miloš Forman: Lives of an Artist
September 22, 23, 29, 30
Distinguished leader of the Czech new wave and celebrated Hollywood director Miloš Forman (born 1932) turned 80 years old this year. From any perspective, his life has had more than its share of dramatic situations. His parents died in concentration camps, his earliest work was challenged by the authorities, and he was denied admission to drama school, yet managed to graduate from the FAMU film academy and work for Czech television in the 1950s. When barely 30, during the early days of cultural liberalization known as the Prague Spring, he launched his experimental approach to filmmaking under the watch of the communist regime. Yet as the brief but pivotal Prague Spring drew to a close in 1968, Forman was forced to leave for the United States where, somewhat tentatively, he resumed his filmmaking career. This cycle of Forman's work is presented in association with the Czech Film Archive and the Embassy of the Czech Republic, with thanks to Barbara Karpetova, Mary Fetzco, and Michal Bregant.
 
 
Origins of the Czech New Wave
September 22 at 4:00
Illustrated lecture by Michal Bregant
Film historian, critic, curator, and director of the Czech Film Archive in Prague, Michal Bregant discusses the career of Miloš Forman and his relationship with the Czech new wave, the artistic movement of the late 1950s and 1960s that profoundly affected the course of European cinema. (Approximately 50 minutes)
 
Audition
followed by Taking Off
September 23 at 4:30
With his first 16 mm camera Forman made Audition, an account of tryouts for a musical play at Prague's famous Semafor Theatre, combining documentary and fiction. A satirical portrait of the young women who flock there merely to show off mediocre talents, the film's imaginative soundtrack is a mix of Czech pop, folk, and classical music. (Konkurs, 1963, 35 mm, Czech with subtitles, 47 minutes)
In the aftermath of his exile, Forman's American debut was Taking Off, another tale that begins with a talent competition. Although it borrows motifs from Audition, the story takes a different turn, focusing on the American suburbanite parents of a runaway daughter who find themselves adrift in the "flower power" counterculture of the era, as they try to locate their girl. Chosen as the official American entry in the 1971 Festival de Cannes, the film—which includes a performance by Ike and Tina Turner—was awarded the jury prize. (1971, 35 mm, 93 minutes)
 
 
The Fireman's Ball
September 29 at 1:00
Introduction by Michael Bregant
A provincial fire department's annual ball erupts in mayhem—raffle prizes are pilfered, the beauty pageant goes awry, the contestants' carousing fathers drink too much—and outside in the town, a house burns down. For a humorously unassuming political allegory, The Fireman's Ball suffered one of the most unusual fates in film history. Not only was the president of Czechoslovakia outraged by its satirical tone, but thousands of volunteer firemen threatened to strike after it opened. Ultimately, the film was banned. (Horí, má panenko, 1967, 35 mm, Czech with subtitles, 71 minutes)
 
 
Black Peter
followed by Loves of a Blonde
September 29 at 3:00
Forman's first full feature was filmed in a small town with a nonprofessional cast who improvised much of their dialogue. Inspired by the vérité approach of Italian neorealism, Black Peter centers on a shy but sympathetic young store clerk who, assigned to apprehend shoplifters, lacks the nerve to confront anyone. Its warmth, ironic humor, and realism were a hit with viewers and, though criticized by the regime, the film was selected as the best picture of 1963 by Czech film critics. (Cerný Petr, 1963, 35 mm, Czech with subtitles, 85 minutes)
Another critical success for Forman was Loves of a Blonde, a tender story of a naive factory worker who has a one-night stand with a musician from Prague and then follows him home. "Forman's humor comes from the fact that his characters peer out at the world like timid nocturnal animals, always prepared to defend themselves against attack but constantly having the ground cut from under their feet by the discovery that people are never quite what they seem"—Tom Milne. (Lásky jedné plavovlásky, 1965, 35 mm, Czech with subtitles, 83 minutes)
 
Amadeus
September 30 at 4:00
Director's cut
Sweeping nearly all major categories in the 1984 Oscars, Forman's adaptation of Peter Shaffer's drama about a brash Mozart and his beleaguered rival Salieri was not without its detractors. Pauline Kael wrote, "The insensitivity to what Mozart might have been like is so flagrant that for the first hour you almost think it's a joke." Returning to Prague for the filming, Miroslav Ondříček’s cinematography captured opulent baroque spaces, while Forman played these period settings as counterpoint to his eccentric characterizations, curiously validating the whole effect. The director’s cut of the film is loaned through the courtesy of the Academy Film Archive and Saul Zaentz. (1984, 35 mm, 180 minutes)

Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? Free screening at Smithsonian American Art Museum Thursday, August 2


 


     A classic starring Liz Taylor and her husband at the time, Richard Burton, every single cast member was nominated for an Academy Award.  This was also Mike Nichols' directorial debut, followed the next year by The Graduate.  Fred Zimmerman had been slated to direct but bailed on the project to direct A Man for All Season instead, the film that beat out Virgina Woolf for the Best Picture Oscar that year.  Amazing performances all around and the cinematography is perfect from Haskell Wexler for which he also won the Oscar.
 

 
Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?

WhenThursday, August 2, 2012, 6:30 – 8:30pm
CategoriesAfter Five, Films
LocationAmerican Art Museum
Event LocationMcEvoy Auditorium, Lower Level
Note
Rated PG (129 minutes; 1966) When Nick and Honey are invited to George and Martha’s home for cocktails, they unexpectedly find themselves witness to a bitter marriage crumbling apart. Starring Elizabeth Taylor and Richard Burton and directed by Mike Nichols, the film won six Academy Awards®, including
Best Actress for Elizabeth Taylor.

Wednesday, May 23, 2012

On the Road vs. Great Gatsby in 2012

     2 of the most well loved American classics are coming to the big screen this year.  Walter Salles, director of the Motorcycle Diaries and the impressive Central Station, directs On the Road, while Baz Luhrman takes another shot at a non-musical with the Great Gatsby.  How is it possible 2 of the most well loved American novels turned to film can be directed by an Australian and a Brazilian?  I'm kind of surprised neither of these titles fell to a Scorsese, Spielberg, or Howard. 
  

    To start with On the Road, on the surface the cast looks impressive, Amy Adams, Kirsten Dunst, Viggo Mortensen, Steve Buscemi, Elizabeth Moss, and Terrence Howard.  On further inspection however, these actors play only the supporting characters.  For some reason funding was drastically cut for this picture, despite being a benchmark of 20th century American literature, and the financial upside of this film can't be that great.  All the major roles are cast with relative unknowns, Sam Riley (Brighton Rock) as Sal Paradise, Tom Sturridge (Being Julia, Pirate Radio) as Carlo Marx, and Garrett Hedlund (Tron Legacy, Friday Night Lights) as Dean Moriarty.  Yes, Kristen Stewart also plays Marylou.  A grouping of relatively hot young actors for sure, but I'm not convinced any of them have the background to pull this off, though I am hopeful.  With a budget of only $25 million you can't really hope for a high caliber cast, beyond this, even even they had to take a pay cut to stay involved. 


     On to Gatsby.  A much bigger budget Hollywood adaptation with the requisite big name stars and director.  Baz Luhrman is really more known for musical pieces like Moulin Rouge and Strictly Ballroom and it should be interesting to see what he can do with a more understated storyline like Gatsby's.  He's been doing mostly short films since the highly anticipated but uneven Australia and this is his jump back into big budget Hollywood, like $127 million big budget films.  I'm not much of a DiCaprio fan outside of This Boy's Life and Basketball Diaries but I think he is perfect for this role of Jay Gatsby.  Much like Catch Me If You Can and Titanic, I can envision him more as a rich Long Islander than I can as some sort of action star as in a Blood Diamond or Gangs of New York.  I can't think of anyone better to cast in this role.  For Daisy Buchanan, Carey Mulligan, probably my favorite current young actress today.  This role was apparently incredibly sought out by the A list Hollywood crowd, Portman, McAdams, Hathaway, Seyfried, Wilde, Johansson, and even Alba were considered.  I think this was a fantastic choice.  For Nick Carraway, Tobey Maguire.  I've never really understood how he has become so popular.  Outside of Wonder Boys and the Ice Storm I've never really appreciated much that he has been in honestly.  The role will reunite him with Mulligan who was also in Brothers with Maguire, but I think the other co-star of that film, Jake Gyllenhaal might have been a better choice.  Maquire is closer to Sam Waterston in looks and demeanor though, the Nick Carraway of the 1974 Francis Ford Coppola written adaptation before this one.  Unfortunately that film never really lived up to the hype either, despite an all star cast of the time with Redford, Farrow, Dern, and Black. 

     I'm sure I'll end up seeing both of these though I'd bet that Gatsby proves to be the real winner.  Fitzgerald's work never really achieves the greatness it deserves on screen.  Benjamin Button was a critical and commercial success of course, but I still think the Last Tycoon with DeNiro is my favorite Fitzgerald adaptation to hit the big screen. 

Monday, April 23, 2012

Wes Anderson's Moonrise Kingdom coming in 2012






  I really have some high hopes for this film.  I like pretty much all of what Wes Anderson has brought to the screen and this cast is phenomenal, Murray, Swinton, Balaban, Norton, Willis, McDormand, Keitel, Schwartzman.....  Roman Coppola writes the screenplay, his first since the enjoyable Darjeeling Limited, and it looks to have the normal quirk of characters expected in a Wes Anderson film, though somehow missing a Wilson brother.  It's also the first PG-13 Anderson film, save for the animated Fantastic Mr. Fox.  All signs point to this being a great film, and one I'm really looking forward to this year.

Monday, April 9, 2012

Altman's Nashville playing at American Art May 24



I'm a huge Robert Altman fan and I've never seen this film on a big screen.  One of the best political films of all time, the themes still relevant today.  This movie is vintage Altman,  the last of his really great 1970's films.  You can't beat FREE. 

WhenThursday, May 24, 2012, 6:30pm
CategoriesAfter Five, Films
LocationAmerican Art Museum, Portrait Gallery
Event LocationMcEvoy Auditorium, Lower Level
CostFree
Note
(1975, 159 min, R) This dark comedy follows twentyfour characters in the country music capital of the world during the hectic days leading up to a rally for a populist presidential hopeful. Directed by Robert Altman.
Classic American films are jointly presented by the Smithsonian American Art Museum and the National Portrait Gallery. The Smithsonian American Art Museum thanks museum patrons for their support of the Film and Media Arts program.

The Hunger Games






     Ah the Hunger Games, where to even begin.  In an effort to stay current on pop culture happenings I broke down and paid to see the the Hunger Games in the theater, in Georgetown no less.  Having never read the books my main draw was Jennifer Lawrence.  She definitely hasn't supplanted Carey Mulligan or Greta Gerwig on my favorite up and coming actress list, but I really like her a lot.  I saw her first in a tiny role in the Burning Plain a couple years back and again in a surprisingly good X Men First class, but nothing was as impressive as Winter's Bone from 2010. Lawrence carries that entire film on her back, a film that made less than $14 million worldwide, but was what I thought, the best film of 2010. She lost the best actress nom to a crappy Natalie Portman in Black Swan, who wasn't even the best actress in that film, in a field that included Kidman, Bening, and Williams.  
     I had a pretty good idea of what the Hunger Games would be all about, and was hoping for a bleak dystopian view of the future like so many classic 1970's films.  I saw that there were some pretty solid actors appearing in minor roles, some great like Woody Harrelson and Stanley Tucci, some barely there like Toby Jones and Donald Sutherland, and some ridiculously over the top like Lenny Kravitz and an unrecognizable Elizabeth Banks.  It had the makings of an enjoyable but most likely formulaic Hollywood action film. 
     It's not that bad actually.  The acting is either over the top like Tucci and Harrelson, or way too bland, like most of the other characters, but nothing yell at the screen bad. I knew the huge draw of the books going into the film and the audience reflected the demographic, with one young lady literally on the edge of her seat throughout the second half of the film.  The problem with getting any book to the screen of course is what to cut out, luckily never having read the books this wasn't a huge issue for me but has apparently ignited several debates among the die hard fans.  My only real problem was that it took too long to get to the actual Hunger Games themselves, and once it did get there, the ending came way too fast and tacked on.  In addition, as with any of these film franchises, I felt like I didn't get a whole movie but rather a third of a film, like watching the first half of the Harry Potter finale. 
     The most confusing thing was how Gary Ross managed to land writing and directing what is sure to be a blockbuster trilogy.   Sure, he's written popular films in the past, Big, Dave, and even the classic Mr. Baseball, but he has basically disappeared for a decade.  His last directing work was Seabiscuit and Pleasantville, and those were years ago, neither showing a penchant for heavier material like Hunger Games. 
    As a big Hollywood film, I enjoyed it, I didn't go in with lofty expectations, and came out entertained.  I actually liked the not so subtle commentary on our voyeuristic and media driven society, and the reflections of our reality TV obsessions.  Thankfully these points weren't labored upon too much.  I pulled for the main character Katniss the entire way thourgh the film as she progressed from unwilling participant to generally dominating badass.  This film isn't going to win any of the talent awards but I left happy I went, and that's really all you can ask for.